<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drywall News and New Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news</link>
	<description>New Drywall Products and Drywalling Methods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 03:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Skim Coating Your Plaster Ceiling</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/skim-coating-plaster-ceiling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/skim-coating-plaster-ceiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 02:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drywall Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint compound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skim coat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skim coat drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skim coating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I skim coated plaster to make it look like smooth drywall and saved a bunch of messy demo and work of installing new drywall. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I helped a friend with his bathroom project. His home was very old and the walls and ceiling of his bathroom were plaster. He removed some of the walls to put in a new tub, and I taped the new drywall to the old plaster. But the plaster was not as even and smooth as the drywall, so I skim coated. To skim coat this, I placed a layer of joint compound on a low spot and then skimmed it off level. I added coats where ever needed. I did not put one thick coat over everything. The All-purpose compound shrunk in a bit, so I applied additional coats after scraping down.  Then, when I was all finished with all my joint work and coats, I lightly sanded the ceiling as well as the other work with 220 grit sand paper on an 8-inch long block using a random circular motion.</p>
<p>The result was a plaster ceiling that could pass for drywall that did not require all the additional demo of removing plaster. A video of me skim coating is shown below.</p>
<p><code><iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SASLJIBiBEg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/skim-coating-plaster-ceiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drywall Info Site Renovation!</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-info-site-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-info-site-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 02:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drywall Taping Pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am now in the process of renovating Drywallinfo.com, in response to what you have suggested and for other reasons. Here are changes that will be made:

Major drywall taping pages will be cleaned up so the code does not cause problems with alternative browsers. These changes will consist of replacing excessive old code that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now in the process of renovating Drywallinfo.com, in response to what you have suggested and for other reasons. Here are changes that will be made:</p>
<ul>
<li>Major drywall taping pages will be cleaned up so the code does not cause problems with alternative browsers. These changes will consist of replacing excessive old code that I put in way back using FrontPage 2003 with up-to-date validated code that uses CSS and is error checked.</li>
<li>A more comprehensive top menu so you may find this blog from any page.</li>
<li>Videos converted to Flash format so users with Macs can view them. I did not realize this was a problem til some helpful site visitor pointed it out recently.</li>
</ul>
<p>Hopefully, you find these changes helpful. It will take a bit of time to do all these changes, but I have already completed the <a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com">drywallinfo</a> home page and much of the the <a title="taping drywall joints" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/tapingjoints.html">drywall taping joints</a> page. As always, I welcome any input you have. Also, I will gladly help you with any drywall questions you have on your current drywall project. Contact me at <a href="mailto:mikesemail2000-drywall@yahoo.com">mikesemail2000-drywall@yahoo.com</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-info-site-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ask This Old House Almost Got Drywall Corners Right</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/this-old-house-drywall-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/this-old-house-drywall-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drywall Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ask this old house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall outside corners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside corners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this old house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask This Old House shows how to finish drywall corners, but leaves out some important details!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 266px"><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/images/cornermetal.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="  " style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="Outside Drywall Corner" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/images/cornermetal.jpg" alt="Checking To Make Sure Screws Sit Below The Surface" width="256" height="205" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Checking To Make Sure Screws Sit Below The Surface</p></div>
<p>My wife called me up from my office to watch <a href="http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/tv/ask-toh" target="_blank">Ask This Old House</a> show how to finish  inside and outside drywall corners.</p>
<p><strong>Outside Corners by Ask This Old House<br />
</strong>First they showed outside corners. I was happy to see that they recommended using corner brace that was either all vinyl or all metal with no paper. (Paper-faced outside corner bead is to be avoided!) And I liked how they showed the application of coats. They left out several  seemingly-insignificant details however. First you must always, always, always scrape down the surface level before applying the next coat! A pimple-size bump of mud will give you a nice speed bump when you apply the next coat! It only takes a minute or two to knock off any such bumps before applying the next coat and it is essential to do. Another crucial step left out was to check to see that no fastening screws or nails were sticking up, as shown in the photo here &#8211; these will also mess up your job! My <a title="Outside Drywall Corners" href="../../outsidecorners.html" target="_blank">outside corner procedure</a> includes these crucial steps.</p>
<p><strong>Inside Corners by Ask This Old House</strong><br />
In their procedure, they recommended the paper-faced metal corner bead. Now this bead works nicely on the perfectly square sample mini-wall they demonstrated on but in reality, most walls are not so ideal. If your 8-ft long corner has even the slightest curve or bend in it, the nice perfect metal corner will not want to conform &#8211; the result is a pocket of air under part of the corner bead! Been there and done that! Instead, I prefer paper tape, which will follow the contour of the wall, using multiple steps to make a perfectly straight looking corner even if the corner you started out with was not straight, as shown in my <a title="Inside Drywall Corners" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/insidecorners.html" target="_blank">inside  corner procedure</a>.</p>
<p>Moral of the story: Don&#8217;t trust everything you see on TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/this-old-house-drywall-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drywall Inside Corners &#8211; Easier Than You Think!</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-inside-corners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-inside-corners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drywall Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall taping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside corners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basic steps for taping and finish drywall inside corners are given in this post. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inside corners of drywall seem near impossible for the beginner to quickly tape and finish! This blog post covers some basics that I think will help:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use paper tape. NEVER mesh tape! Mesh is easily snagged by a taping knife, and that is very easy to do here since you are skimming down both sides of the corner.</li>
<li>Do not use metal-backed corners that are mudded on. In theory, these seem like the perfect solution. But if you wall is not perfectly level, the metal will cause the corner to &#8220;pop off&#8221;, resulting in gaps in the mud underneath.</li>
<li>Wet down the paper by very quickly passing through a bucket of water. Shake off the tape to remove most of the water. You don&#8217;t want the tape to be wet (and shred), just slightly dampened. A spray bottle would also work.</li>
<li>Follow the procedure shown in the video below (there is audio to go with the diagram). Also, go to <a title="inside corner drywall taping" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/insidecorners.html">http://www.drywallinfo.com/insidecorners.html</a> for detailed steps, photos, and videos.</li>
</ul>
<p><code><iframe width="500" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eBvYy5CD100" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/drywall-inside-corners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanging 8 ft or 12 ft drywall?</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/8-ft-12-ft-drywall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/8-ft-12-ft-drywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drywall Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall taping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hang drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hanging drywall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should you use eight foot long drywall hung vertically or twelve foot long drywall hung horizontally? This article discusses advantages of each method and makes recommendations. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-294" style="margin: 5px 8px;" title="12ftdrywall" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/12ftdrywall-245x300.jpg" alt="12ftdrywall" width="245" height="300" />Often the question is asked &#8220;Should I go with 8 foot sheets of drywall hung vertically or 12 foot sheets of drywall hung horizontally?&#8221; This article addresses that question and offers advice on a case-by-case basis.</p>
<p><strong>Advantages of Hanging 8 ft Long Drywall</strong></p>
<p>The one obvious advantage of 8 foot long pieces of drywall is the ability of a single person to pick up a full piece and position it in place. Twelve foot long pieces, unless you have unusual strength, are near impossible to handle alone. And if you have to fish a 12 foot long piece around corners and down stairs, it may be impossible.</p>
<p>You may transport 8 ft long drywall pieces within a closed full-sized SUV or truck bed or even in the back of many mini-vans (like a Grand Caravan). 12 ft pieces will require a fairly long trailer or require a delivery charge.</p>
<p>Another advantage of eight foot long pieces of drywall is that when sheets are placed vertically on walls, all seams lie within a recess. And this means you do not need to do the extra work involved in <a title="Butt Joint Procedure" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/butt_joints.html" target="_blank">properly finishing a butt joint</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Advantages of Hanging 12 ft Long Drywall</strong></p>
<p>One advantage of 12 ft long sheets is that you may cover an entire wall of a small room (less than 12 ft wide) with only two sheets fastened horizontally! And in general, if the width of an area is 12 feet or less, you can cover it with two sheets and a single recess joint running horizontally down the center.</p>
<p>12 foot long pieces of drywall, fastened horizontally will result in a stronger, more stable wall. I can vouch for this personally even though I use 8 ft sheets for nearly any remodeling job I do: When I hang drywall around windows or doors, I will usually hang the sheets horizontally so as to <a title="vertical drywall seam" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/images/window-joints.GIF" target="_blank">avoid a vertical seam at the edge of a door or window</a> . This use of horizontal sheets around windows will add stability to the structure and reduce the seam cracks that occur at vertical seams during winter sub-zero temperatures. And, in fact, I have even <a title="Repair Window Crack in Drywall" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-repair.html" target="_blank">removed drywall around windows</a> where a vertical joint was cracking and replaced it with a horizontally orientated sheet.</p>
<p>12 ft sheets, hung horizontally will reduce the total amount of taping required.  For an 11-ft wide wall, only 11 total feet of taping is required vs. 16 ft of vertical taping for 8 ft sheets hung vertically. For a 13 foot wide wall,  one would have to use a total of four 12-ft sheets, cut down and staggered horizontally, resulting in 21 feet of taping, 8 ft of which would consist of butt joints. For 8 ft sheets hung vertically, there would be 24 ft of taping, all in recessed joints (no butt joints). So in both cases taping is reduced, but in the latter case, you have nearly as much taping and 8 ft of butt joints.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>
<p>If you are a DIYer remodeling a wall or small room, 8 ft sheets are your best bet. In a remodel job, you lack the luxury of being able to freely move pieces through wide open spaces. Rather you must somehow snake a 12 ft piece around corners, furniture, etc and you will need help in moving the piece. Also, do you want to mess with a 12&#8242; trailer or pay for delivery of 3 or 4 sheets of 12-ft long drywall? And even though 12 ft pieces offer more strength from being hung horizontally, you may still hang your 8 ft pieces horizontally around windows and doors where that strength is needed. In areas away from doors and windows, I have never noticed strength issues, like buckling or cracked seams, for vertically hung 8 ft sheets. Of course this recommendation is contingent on your local building codes.</p>
<p>If you are building new, I would recommend using the 12 ft sheets. You will most likely opt to have the drywall delivered anyway so that is not an issue. And you will probably not be doing this drywall job alone, at least I would not recommend it! You will probably want to rent or borrow a lift so that would help with the positioning of these longer, heavier, pieces. The 12 ft sheets will give you the best strength and will result in less taping. If you hire a taper, they will probably charge you no more for butt joints than recess joints so less taping could save you a little money as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/8-ft-12-ft-drywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>StudTHUD® Magnetic Studfinder Review</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/studthud-magnetic-studfinder-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/studthud-magnetic-studfinder-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Drywall Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic studfinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stud finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stud thud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studTHUD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The StudTHUD is a magnetic stud finder that will accurately find a stud very fast. The magnet is so powerful it causes the stud finder to veer toward the stud and stick to the wall. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-280" style="margin: 5px 8px;" title="studthud-wall300" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/studthud-wall300.JPG" alt="studthud-wall300" width="300" height="225" />The inventor of the StudTHUD<span style="font-size: x-small;">®</span>, a magnetic stud finder that uses a super-sensitive magnet that &#8220;thuds&#8221; against the wall when it passes over a drywall nail or screw, sent me one of his inventions to test out. I had been following the progress of this invention for a while and had corresponded with the inventor quite a bit. Before actually trying it, I quite honestly was a little skeptical as to why it was any better than any other magnetic studfinder. But my skepticism left when I actually tried it.</p>
<p>Here are the Pros and Cons that I found:</p>
<h3>Pros of the StudTHUD<span style="font-size: x-small;">®</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>The StudTHUD<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> </span>® found studs very fast! The magnet was so powerful that it even pulled the stud finder toward the stud, with the StudTHUD® thumping against the wall when it located the stud.</li>
<li>Upon locating the stud, this magnetic studfinder would usually stick to the wall due to the powerful force of the magnet.</li>
<li>The Stud<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> </span>THUD<span style="font-size: xx-small;"> </span>® has the same width as a normal building stud. Thus, it is almost impossible to miss the stud if you mark your stud midway on the stud finder. A traditional electronic stud finder can sometimes leave you guessing at times.</li>
<li>The StudTHUD® was able to find a stud even under tile!</li>
<li>No batteries! I came to appreciate this when I compared this product to my traditional electronic stud finder that did not work because it contained a corroded dead battery.</li>
<li>The product was easy to use. In the video below, my son found studs with no special instructions except &#8220;slide the stud finder over the wall until the magnet finds a stud&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Cons of the StudTHUD<span style="font-size: x-small;">®</span></h3>
<ul>
<li>The StudTHUD® needs metallic fasteners. Thus in the unlikely event that the drywall is only glued to studs underneath, you will not find the stud. This might also be a problem in a tight area that just happens to not have fasteners on the drywall in the area.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>
<p>The StudTHUD® is a product that I think every homeowner would want to have, perhaps in addition to an electronic stud finder. I found it to be more precise and foolproof than the electronic stud finder I have, and it did not need batteries.  I look forward to seeing it on the market &#8211; it would make a nice stocking stuffer for just about anybody on my Christmas list. This product is going to be available late 2011 &#8211; for more info, see <a href="http://studthud.com/" target="_blank">http://studthud.com/</a>.</p>
<p>Watch my son find some studs in the video below. He found the first stud very quickly due to a little luck I think and it took a little more effort finding a stud under the tile. The video was unrehearsed and unedited.</p>
<p><a title="StudTHUD Review" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/videos/StudTHUD%ae_Review.wmv" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-277 alignnone" title="studthudpic" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/studthudpic.jpg" alt="studthudpic" width="300" height="233" /></a></p>
<p>Disclosure Statement: Other than being given this product for me to  review, I have not been compensated in any way  by the inventor of this product. The value of this product is approximately $10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/studthud-magnetic-studfinder-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wallboarders Buddy Review</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wallboarders-buddy-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wallboarders-buddy-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Drywall Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallboard buddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wallboarders buddy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Wallboarder's Buddy review, I take a look at this new drywall cutting product that claims to save a lot of time. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/images/wallboarders-buddy.JPG" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px 13px;" title="wallboarders-buddy" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/wallboarders-buddy-300x225.jpg" alt="wallboarders-buddy" width="300" height="225" /></a>I was invited to try a new product called the <a title="Wallboarders Buddy" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/images/wallboarders-buddy.JPG" target="_blank">Wallboarders Buddy</a> by the inventor of this  product. I gladly accepted, as it appeared to be a nice product. After completing this review, I will donate the product to a friend that is a professional contractor &#8211; it could be a big time saver for him.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of Pros and Cons I observed:</p>
<p><strong>Pros of the Wallboarder&#8217;s Buddy</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>This wallboard cutting product is extremely easy to use. The video posted below was made only a day after I received the product. It is pretty self-evident how you use this product. Set your width, and run the guide down the side of the drywall piece scoring as you go.</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t have to even use your tape measure to set up your cut. The guide has a precise measurement setting that locks in place. And it proved to be quite accurate. So if you need a 44&#8243; wide sheet, simply cut off 4&#8243; from one edge of the full 48&#8243; wide sheet. The Wall Boarders Buddy, able to cut accurately on both sides, would be very handy for trimming a sheet from 96&#8243; to 95&#8243;, a task that can be very time consuming.</li>
<li>The pieces break off much cleaner than the usual score, bend, and break method due to the fact that you score the drywall on both the front and back of the sheet.</li>
<li>This product is fast. Despite my inexperience with the Wallboarders Buddy, I was able to measure, score, and cut the piece in the video in about a minute and a half.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons of the Wallboarder&#8217;s Buddy</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>When cutting smaller pieces, it is more difficult to keep the guide in place properly against the edge. In a trial piece cut before the one in the video, I cut a smaller piece and it was difficult to use the guide unless someone else held the piece. But this would not be an issue with a full sheet or even a half sheet since the weight of the bigger heavier piece would hold it in place as you cut.</li>
<li>One must take care to keep the guide straight. I did not have too much difficulty, although on the smaller piece mentioned in the previous paragraph, the guide strayed from the edge and resulted in a non-straight cut. Keeping the guide on course would not be too difficult on a full size sheet I think.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p>
<p>This would be a great product for the person doing a lot of drywall cutting in the building of their home or a major remodel. I think that a professional drywall contractor would definitely want to have this product since time is money, and this product could for sure save some time. And how many times does one have to cut 96&#8243; sheets down to 94&#8243; or 95&#8243; in a remodeling job? This product would save a lot of time. Given the fact that it took me, with my limited experience using the tool, only a minute and a half to measure and make the cut shown in the video below, I think a professional could easily cut pieces to size in a minute or less. For more information and videos on this product, see <a title="Wallboarders Buddy" href="http://www.wallboardersbuddy.com" target="_blank">http://www.wallboardersbuddy.com</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/videos/wallboarders-buddy.wmv" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-263  alignnone" title="wallboarders-buddy" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/wallboarders-buddy2.JPG" alt="Wallboarders Buddy Review" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>Disclosure Statement: Other than being given this product for me to review, which I will donate away, I have not been compensated in any way by the producer of this product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wallboarders-buddy-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Patching Plaster (Spackle) To Quickly Repair Nail Pops and Holes</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/plaster-spackle-repair-nail-holes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/plaster-spackle-repair-nail-holes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drywall Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Drywall Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doorknob dents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall taping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nail holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching plaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandable spackle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a sandable patching plaster to save a lot of time when fixing drywall nail holes, dents, and when pre-filling drywall gaps prior to taping.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-246   alignleft" style="margin: 8px;" title="plaster3" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/plaster3-300x300.jpg" alt="Sandable Patching Plaster (Spackle)" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p>When repairing nail holes, nail pops in drywall, or pre-filling large gaps between sheets or in corners, you may use ordinary all-purpose joint compound. But, this compound takes a fairly long time to dry and also will shrink a fair amount, requiring additional coats (and time). A better way to do these types of jobs is to use a sand-able patching plaster (also known as spackle). There are many suitable products, but the one I tried and found to work well is DAP  Sandable Patching Plaster, available at most hardware or home stores. Just make sure the product states &#8220;sands easily&#8221;.</p>
<p>I used this product to fill in some nail holes and also I used it to fill in a dent in my drywall made from a door handle. In the case of the door handle dent I placed and excess amount of the  patching plaster (rather than skimming it level) just to see if it would sand off OK. It sanded just fine, almost as easily as joint compound. See photos below.</p>
<p>Another place you would want to use this type of compound would be to pre-fill in gaps between two sheets of drywall before you tape. Joint compound can take a long time to dry, and if the gaps are large, ordinary joint compound can even crack as it shrinks, requiring follow-up coats to account for shrinkage. A quick drying, low shrinkage sandable spackle or patching plaster prevents both of these problems!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/plaster4-horz.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-247 aligncenter" style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="plaster4-horz-400" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/plaster4-horz-400.jpg" alt="plaster4-horz-400" width="400" height="200" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/plaster-spackle-repair-nail-holes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hercules Hook 23.5 Pounds Hung For 14 Months</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/hercules-hook-experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/hercules-hook-experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Drywall Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hercules hooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drywall anchors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hercules hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 14 months my 23.5 pound weight is still being held up by a single Hercules Hook, but it looks like it could come down soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of April in 2009, I hung <a title="hercules hook" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/hercules-hooks-review-part-iii/">23.5 pounds from a single Hercules Hook</a>. VK6CXBWT366F Since that time I have kept a record of what happened. The hook deformed a little, then a little more, and even a little more still. But still the weight is held up! After 14 months, the 23.5 pounds of weight still hangs and the hook has maintained it previous deformation (at 9 months) of 1/2 inch. The hook, however dug into the wall to about a quarter inch. I would not want anything valuable hanging in such a fashion, since a little more of the hook digging in could pull it out fairly easily. As I mentioned in previous posts, one could provide some insurance by using a combination of a hook and a screw in a stud to hold up a heavy 20-pound mirror or painting. For light wall hangings, however, I would have no reservations. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DSCF3302.JPG"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-217" title="DSCF3302" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DSCF3302-300x300.jpg" alt="DSCF3302" width="248"  /></a> <a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DSCF3298.JPG"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-218" title="DSCF3298" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DSCF3298-300x300.jpg" alt="DSCF3298" width="248" /></a></p>
<p>I think my next update will be a video of me measuring the amount of weight required to bring this 23.5 pound weight down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/hercules-hook-experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strait Flex Drywall Tape &#8211; Great For Odd Angles!</title>
		<link>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/strait-flex-tape-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/strait-flex-tape-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drywallinfoman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Drywall Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strait flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strait flex review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straitflex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Strait Flex drywall tape worked great for odd angles!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/straitflex2.JPG" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-206" style="margin: 7px;" title="straitflex2" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/straitflex2-224x300.jpg" alt="straitflex2" width="224" height="300" /></a>The photo shown here illustrates the challenges my friend Luke faced in finishing his log cabin. About half his walls were natural log, but the other half were finished drywall. And being log built, it is natural to have more non-90-degree angles than a traditional home. So I let Luke use the samples I had of <a title="Strait Flex Tape" href="http://store.straitflex.com/product_p/so-100-c.htm" target="_blank">Strait Flex Non-Paper Tape</a> for these odd angles.  And it worked very well for him! He used the Original, Mid-size, and Large-size tape. Luke used the tape to not only tape seams but also to bridge small gaps at the corners. I had tried this product as well in the past and have a <a title="Taping Wide Angles" href="http://www.drywallinfo.com/taping-wide-angles.html">step-by-step taping tutorial available here</a>. The nice thing about this product is that it is readily available at Menards home stores and other home stores and hardware stores. <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205" title="straitflex1" src="http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/straitflex1.JPG" alt="straitflex1" width="500" /><br />
<sub>Disclaimer: Strait flex sent me product samples free of charge to try out. I was not compensated in any other way.</sub></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drywallinfo.com/drywall-news/strait-flex-tape-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

